Back to top anchor
Cabinet Office circular

CO (22) 2 - Revised Fees Framework for members appointed to bodies in which the Crown has an interest

Issue date: 
Thursday, 6 October 2022
Issue status: 
Current

Revised Fees Framework for members appointed to bodies in which the Crown has an interest

1Cabinet recently agreed to a revised Fees Framework for determining or reassessing the fees paid to members of statutory and other bodies in which the Crown has an interest [APH-22-MIN-0195].

2This circular and the attached Framework replaces Cabinet Office Circular CO (19)1.

3The revised Framework covers all statutory bodies, non-statutory bodies and committees in which the Crown has an interest, that are outside the Remuneration Authority’s or other fee-setting bodies’ jurisdiction. The Framework therefore covers most Crown entities (including Crown Agents, Autonomous Crown Entities (ACEs) and tertiary education institutions), trust boards, advisory bodies and committees, Royal Commissions, Public Inquiries, Government Inquiries and Ministerial Inquiries, statutory tribunals, individuals appointed as statutory bodies that are not covered by the Remuneration Authority and some subsidiary bodies. 

4The Framework provides guidance on the classification and remuneration of statutory and other Crown bodies. Since the Framework covers a varied array of bodies, it is not intended to be prescriptive, and judgement will be required to determine best fit.

5The purpose of the Framework is to provide a basis for judgement in setting fees that will:

  • ensure a consistent approach to remuneration across all statutory and other Crown bodies;
  • contain expenditure of public funds within reasonable limits;
  • provide flexibility within clear criteria.

6The main changes to the previous Framework are:

6.1an increase of ten percent to the fee ranges for Groups 2, 3 and 4 bodies;

6.2independent members who chair sub committees will receive the same fee as a member of the parent body who chairs a sub committee;

6.3if no legislative impediment exists, co-chairs may be appointed. Applicable chair rates will apply to both;

6.4all members of a body receive the same member rate when a body is appointed without a chair;

6.5deputy chairs or members acting as chair receive the rate for the chair role;

6.6Health Responsible Authorities are specifically excluded from the Framework;

6.7greater clarity is to be provided about situations where an organisation might have more than one prime function;

6.8allowing the Minister for the Public Service to approve technical or minor exceptions to standing exceptions without Cabinet consideration;

6.9clarifying that joint members of a parent board and its advisory committee are not paid twice for attendance at the same meeting;

6.10updates to the tax guidance section in the Framework;

6.11other minor administrative changes, such as updating links and references to current legislation and fixing minor omissions and errors.

7Ministers and chief executives should ensure that all staff involved in appointments to bodies covered by the Framework are familiar with the requirements of this circular.

Further information

8For advice on the application and interpretation of the Fees Framework, contact the Public Service Commission, email: fees@publicservice.govt.nz or phone (04) 495 6600.

9For advice on taxation on fees, contact Denise Birdling, Team Lead, Significant Enterprises, email: Denise.Birdling@ird.govt.nz or phone (04) 890 6295.

Rachel Hayward
Acting Secretary of the Cabinet

Cabinet Fees Framework

Executive summary

1The Cabinet Fees Framework (the Framework) should be used:

  • before an appointment is submitted to the Cabinet Appointments and Honours Committee (APH);
  • when a new body or committee is being established;
  • if there is a proposed significant change in board duties;
  • when the classification of the body or the current fees are being reviewed; and
  • for guidance about the administration of fees and other reimbursement payments for bodies covered by the Framework.

2The purpose of the Framework is to provide a basis for judgement in setting fees that will:

  • ensure a consistent approach to remuneration across all statutory and other Crown bodies;
  • support the appointment of appropriately qualified and diverse body members;
  • contain expenditure of public funds within reasonable limits; and
  • provide flexibility within clear criteria.

3The Framework enables fees to be determined by Ministers and other fee-setting authorities who are most familiar with the work of particular bodies. It provides for:

  • responsibility for setting fees for statutory and other bodies in which the Crown has an interest, within clearly defined parameters, to rest with the responsible Ministers or another fee-setting authority;
  • a system for the classification of bodies for fee-setting or reviewing purposes (section D);
  • a range of fee levels for each category of body (section D);
  • a process for setting and reviewing fees, and for proposing fees outside the Framework (sections B, E and F);
  • an outline of administrative principles to be followed in applying the Framework (sections C and G);

4The role of the Public Service Commission (the Commission) includes:

  • administering the Framework;
  • conducting triennial surveys of fee levels and reporting to Cabinet on fees expenditure;
  • conducting regular reviews of the Framework and recommending changes for consideration by Cabinet;
  • advising the Minister for the Public Service about exceptions to the Framework;
  • advising agencies about any aspects of the Framework; and
  • assisting in the interpretation and application of the Framework if required.

5Agencies apply the Framework in making recommendations and/or setting fees for body members.

6Agencies are strongly advised to consult the Commission on any fee matter (such as an exception) that the responsible Minister will need to refer to the Minister for the Public Service, before formally submitting this to the responsible Minister. The Commission can advise on precedents and the information required to support the recommendation.

7Please refer to the summary flow charts in section B for setting or reviewing fees and, if required, in section E for seeking an exception to the Framework.

8The Framework should be read in conjunction with the:

Section A: Coverage by the Framework

Bodies covered by the Framework

9The Framework is one of three fee setting mechanisms for statutory and other “bodies in which the Crown has an interest”. A broad array of agencies and individual officers come within this scope, as indicated in the table below. The term “bodies in which the Crown has an interest” is used in several Acts to apply the Framework to a body or bodies named in the Act, but the term is not defined. It is understood generally to:

  • be broader than ‘government agency’ if that term is synonymous with agencies that operate within the executive branch of government, or that operate as instruments under direct or indirect Ministerial control or direction, or where the body or individual is appointed by a Minister or an agency;
  • encompass certain bodies and individuals in the judicial branch of government;
  • include bodies and individuals that carry out some aspect of the business or responsibilities of central government, or that scrutinise or investigate or assist the agencies that do so directly;

An element of judgement is needed in particular cases to determine whether or not a body fits within the scope of the Framework; 

10The Framework complements the fee-setting role of the Remuneration Authority (under the Remuneration Authority Act 1977) and the Crown Company Fees Methodology administered by the Treasury. The Framework is used to set the fees for government-related bodies and their subsidiaries that are outside the jurisdiction of the Remuneration Authority, the Treasury, or a separate fee mechanism such as applies to School Boards of Trustees (where the Minister sets the fees under the Education (School Boards) Regulations 2020) and local authorities (where the Remuneration Authority sets the fees under the Local Government Act 2002).

11Consultation with the Minister for the Public Service should take place about fees when trans-Tasman bodies have been established, as specific provisions may apply to such bodies that override the general application of the Framework. 

12Establishment by statute is not the only criterion for coverage by the Framework, nor is it a necessary requirement that there be a responsible Minister. It should also be noted that the Framework covers bodies that are self-funded, where a responsible Minister appoints some or all the members. The Minister should apply the Framework in circumstances where the body has the responsibility for setting fees and the Minister approves them.

Exclusions

Consultancies

13The Framework does not cover individual consultancies that would fall outside any of the categories listed in section D of the Framework (paragraph 98). Such individual consultancies involve contractors appointed by a body in which the Crown has an interest under a contract for services for a specific project, usually within a specified timeframe.

14In general, the key distinctions between a consultancy and a body covered by the Framework are that a consultancy has:

  • defined deliverables for a finite period of time;
  • no ownership or governance in relation to the implementation and operation of the deliverables of the project.

15It is possible, however, that in some cases there may be a judgement involved between using a consultancy on the one hand, or using a body referred to under paragraph 98, Group 4 (All Other Committees and Bodies), notably an advisory committee.

16Where agencies are unclear about whether an advisory committee or other Group 4 body would be more appropriate than a consultancy, particularly in cases of high public profile, they are encouraged to contact the Commission for advice in the first instance and then refer the issue to the responsible Minister and Minister for the Public Service. Where a Group 4 body is appointed, its remuneration would be set under the Framework.

17Refer to paragraph 153 regarding payments to body members where it is proposed that they also receive payments as consultants to the same body.

Other exclusions

18The Framework is not used for bodies where the fees are set by the Remuneration Authority, for School Boards of Trustees, or for local authorities, where the fees are set using a separate mechanism.

19Fees for directors of Crown entity companies and State-Owned Enterprises are subject to separate guidance from the Crown Company Fees Methodology.

Summary

20A summary of bodies covered and not covered by the Framework is outlined below:

Bodies covered by the Framework Bodies not covered by the Framework

Royal Commissions, public inquiries, government inquiries and ministerial inquiries. Statutory Tribunals and Authorities.

Individuals appointed as statutory bodies (that are separate from statutory officer roles in an agency, e.g. Registrar of Companies; Director of Mental Health) or to specified advisory posts e.g. lay members of courts.

Advisory bodies, committees and taskforces established by Cabinet or a Minister or agency, whose role is generally to oversee or review or provide advice to a Minister or Ministers, or an agency.

Boards of Trusts settled by the Crown or specified in statute, or the Trust Deed as covered by the Framework.

The following roles and bodies covered by the Remuneration Authority:

  • Members of Parliament
  • the Judiciary
  • independent Crown entities (remuneration, not expenses)
  • a Crown agent or autonomous Crown entity that is a corporation sole (remuneration, not expenses)
  • specified statutory officers and members of local authorities and community boards
  • other bodies and officers whose fees and/or allowances and expenses are specified in statute to be set by the Remuneration Authority.

Bodies to which the Framework applies as provided for in legislation:

  • Crown Agents (named in Schedule 1 Part 1 of the Crown Entities Act 2004 [CEA])
  • Autonomous Crown entities (named in Schedule 1 Part 2 of the CEA)
  • Expenses, not remuneration, of members of Independent Crown entities (named in Schedule 1 Part 3 of the CEA) and of a Crown agent or Autonomous Crown entity that is a corporation sole
  • Subsidiaries (as defined in the CEA) of Crown agents, Autonomous Crown entities and Independent Crown entities
  • Tertiary Education Institutions (established under Part 14 of the Education Act 1989 or section 268 of the Education and Training Act 2020) 
  • Diverse bodies covered by the Framework in accordance with an individual Act, e.g. The Archives Council.

Crown Company Fees Methodology, approved by Cabinet and administered by the Treasury:

  • State-owned enterprises (named in Schedule 1 of the State-Owned Enterprises Act 1986) and their subsidiaries
  • Crown entity companies (named in Schedule 2 of the Crown Entities Act 2004, and which includes Crown Research Institutes) and their subsidiaries
  • Companies named in Schedule 4A or Schedule 5 of the Public Finance Act 1989, and their subsidiaries.

Bodies to which the Fees and Travelling Allowances Act 1951 (FTAA) applies:

  • About 100 separate Acts apply the FTAA to bodies specified in those Acts
  • the rights to entitlement provided for in the FTTA are implemented in practice through the Framework

Bodies explicitly covered by a separate regime, e.g.:

  • School Boards of Trustees (section 19 of the Education (School Boards)  Regulations 2020) and their subsidiaries
  • Health Responsible Authorities (section 133(3) of the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003)
  • Reserve Bank (section 63 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989)
  • Air New Zealand Limited
  • Christchurch International Airport Limited 
  • Dunedin International Airport Limited 
  • Hawke’s Bay Airport Limited.

A consultancy (generally contracted to provide services to an agency).

Agencies and individuals consulted during the normal course of business (e.g. on a policy proposal) or who make a submission on a proposal. 

Section B: Process for setting or reviewing fees

21The steps to be taken to set or review fees under the Framework are:

  • Determine whether the body is covered by the Framework (see section A);
  • Decide or re-assess which Framework group the body fits into (see section D);
  • Determine which level within the group is most appropriate by “scoring” the body according to the factors listed (see section D); 
  • Decide on the appropriate fee (see section D) referring particularly to paragraph 30 regarding factors to be considered in setting fees;
  • If the fee is being set for the first time, the fee setting authority approves the fee within the applicable Framework fee range (note section F regarding reviewing fees), and within other guidance contained in the Framework. If the fee-setting authority wishes to set the fee outside the Framework, an exception must be sought, unless a standing exception has been approved. Please refer to section E for guidance on setting fees outside the Framework;
  • If the fee is being reviewed (note section F regarding reviewing fees), the chief executive or governance board of the agency, may agree to fee increases of up to 3% per cent, within the applicable fee range and not more frequently than once a year, for bodies they have established; 
  • For all bodies, the responsible Minister may approve increases of up to 5 percent within the applicable Framework fee range, not more frequently than once a year;  
  • The Minister for the Public Service must be consulted on any increase above 5 percent and may approve fee increases up to 10 percent, and minor and technical changes to fees; 
  • Any increase above 10 percent, or that takes the fee above the applicable Framework fee range, must be referred to APH and Cabinet for consideration;  
  • For guidance on setting fees outside the Framework, please refer to section E; 

22It is strongly recommended that when existing fees are being reviewed, the above steps be undertaken to re-assess the classification and level of the body;

23Note that fees should be increased no more frequently than once a year; 

24The following flow chart summarises the process to use when setting or reviewing fees. Other sections of the Framework should be read in addition to the summary chart as they provide more detailed advice about the process the fee setting authority should follow when setting or reviewing fees:

  

Setting and Reviewing Fees - Flowchart

Section C: Guidance about fees

Who sets the fees

25The fee setting authority is the position or organisation that has the authority to establish a body covered by the Framework. This may be set in legislation.

26In many cases, responsible Ministers set fees within the applicable framework range, except for subsidiary bodies of statutory entities and bodies established by agencies. (Refer also to section E regarding Ministers’ roles in setting fees outside the parameters of the Framework and section F regarding reviewing fees.)

27For members of subsidiary bodies of statutory entities, (i.e. of Crown Agents, ACEs, Independent Crown Entities (ICEs)) the board of the parent entity sets the fees within the applicable framework range. Exceptions to the Framework (see section E) for subsidiary bodies require prior consultation with the parent entity’s responsible Minister, and the Minister for the Public Service (with advice from the Commission). It is advisable to discuss proposed exceptional fees with the Commission in the first instance.

28The default process for some Group 4 bodies where there is no responsible Minister or relevant legislation (e.g. bodies established by chief executives or governance boards of agencies) is that the fee-setting authority (e.g. the chief executive or governance board) should apply the Framework in order to determine the fee. If the proposed fee is outside the parameters of the Framework, it must be treated as an exception under the Framework (see section E).

29For those bodies covered by the Fees and Travelling Allowances Act 1951, the Minister for the Public Service has delegated responsibility for setting fees within this Framework to Ministers responsible for the particular appointments and/or setting the remuneration levels. If the proposed fee is outside the parameters of the Framework, the agreement of the Minister for the Public Service is required, and the matter may need to be considered by APH and Cabinet (see section E).

Factors to be considered in setting or reviewing fees 

30Ministers, agencies, and other fee setting authorities should refer to section D to classify the body under the Framework and then ensure the actual fees reflect an element of public service and community commitment, the personal contribution and recognition of the intangible benefits to the member, balanced by: 

  • the complexity of the functions and the expertise required;
  • recruitment and retention issues;
  • the extent to which an individual member needs to insure against personal liability;
  • the potential risk to reputation;
  • the degree to which the role is in the public eye;
  • affordability; and
  • the period since the fees were last reviewed.

31Fees will continue to be set on a fair but conservative basis to reflect a discount for the element of public service involved.

32Where the fee is paid as an annual rate, it should also reflect the time involved (see paragraph 38).

33Members occupying identical positions on the same body should be paid the same fee rate. The fee rate is varied only to reflect additional responsibility such as that assumed by chairpersons (and deputies and the chair of a substantial sub-committee where appropriate) who may receive an extra margin for additional responsibilities that go with the role. The exception to this is when fees have been grand-parented (refer paragraph 149).

34In cases where it is necessary to secure people with scarce specialist skills, consideration may be given to paying a fee higher than the applicable range. Please refer to section E.

35It is possible to pay fees below the range, provided they reflect the factors noted in paragraph 30.

Payment basis

36There are two approaches to expressing fee levels - annual rates and daily rates. Any other variations, including annualising daily rates, are regarded as exceptions to the Framework and require prior consultation at Ministerial level (see section E).

Annual rate

37For Group 3 bodies, the fee is usually expressed as an annual rate. This is consistent with the approach taken in the private sector and is most appropriate where the workload is predictable and/or substantial.

38The annual fee is set on the following assumptions:

  • the work is such that the chair and members are required on a part-time basis;
  • for general governance boards, the assumed annual workload for meetings and other responsibilities associated with the role is that:
    • a member works around 30 days a year, which is in line with the amount of time spent by board directors in private sector companies;
    • chairs have a higher workload than members, with the assumption that a chair works around 50 days per year. Therefore, the fee for chairs is set at twice the rate of the members to take account of both the differences in responsibility and in workload.

39Where it is anticipated that a chair or members will have a lesser workload than above, it is expected that this be reflected in the fee level. The workload expectation covers all authorised work undertaken by members including subcommittee work and preparation time.

40For those situations where a greater workload is expected, please seek advice from the Commission. Where significant additional work is required, it may be appropriate to negotiate additional payments.

41Payment for additional work should be agreed by the fee-setting authority before the work is undertaken. The key objectives for the additional work must be clearly specified and evaluated on completion. A higher annual rate for a fixed period, and based on defined goals, may also be appropriate where chairs are required to undertake significant additional work (e.g. where they are required to guide the reorientation or restructuring of a Crown entity, or where the situation of a Crown entity requires the chair to act more in the nature of an executive director). However, such additional work should otherwise relate to the governance role of the board and should not cover activities that are more properly within the role of management.

42The fee-setting authority is required to consult with the Minister for the Public Service before committing to payments for additional work and is responsible for monitoring progress against the negotiated objectives.

43For members of Group 3b subsidiary bodies of statutory entities (e.g. of Crown agents, autonomous Crown entities, and independent Crown entities) who receive an annual fee, there is no assumed annual workload specified for the members. Time is one of the factors to be considered by the parent entity when setting the fees, with reference to paragraph 30.

44Where it is possible to predict the workload of bodies other than governance boards, the annual fee should be calculated by multiplying the daily rate by the number of days that will be worked during the year.

45Proposals for an annual fee for a Group 1, 2 or 4 body should be treated as technical exceptions and referred to the responsible Minister and Minister for the Public Service. In making submissions to Ministers or reporting to the Commission, it will be necessary to specify the annual fee if this has been agreed, and provide the daily rate on which the proposal is based, and the number of days that will be worked per annum.

Daily rate

46For Groups 1, 2 and 4 bodies, fee levels are generally expressed as a daily rate, as this works best for those bodies that have an unpredictable workload. Where a chair or member of a Group 2 body that is administered by the Ministry of Justice, works full time consistently, the daily rate will be multiplied by 220 days. This number will be pro-rated for those who work substantially full time.

47For Group 3 governance boards that pay a daily rate due to an unpredictable workload, the maximum annual rate provided in the range that applies to the classification must not be exceeded unless an exception to the Framework is agreed.

48It is expected that a working day is about 8 hours, and the daily fee is calculated on this basis. Work for longer than 8 hours in one day must not attract an extra payment, unless the combination of travel and work is frequently longer than 8 hours (see para 82).

49Hourly pro-rata rates should be calculated by dividing the daily rate by 8 and multiplying by the number of hours worked.

50The daily fee applies to all work, including that performed outside of meetings (e.g. preparation, representing the board at other forums, or administrative work) that is required for the body to carry out its role. All work that is required to be performed for the body by the member should be paid at the approved daily rate.

51Where a total of 6 hours is worked in one day, a daily fee may be paid. It is accepted that it may not be possible for a member having worked 6 hours in one day on body business to return to other paid work. Where a member spends time, for example one evening, preparing for a meeting the next day, if the preparation and meeting time combined were between 6 and 8 hours, then one daily fee would be paid for the combined preparation and meeting time.

52Work other than preparation for meetings/sittings must be approved and minuted by the body before it is undertaken. Individual members should not be in a position where they could be considered to be setting their own work programmes without the endorsement of the body.

Other fee payment methods/other types of payments

53Other fee payment methods such as a base honorarium and/or a fee for additional services, or Crown bodies setting their own fees from a total pool, are regarded as exceptions to the Framework. If such fee payment methods are proposed, refer to section E. Early discussion with the Commission is recommended.

54Where a member is a self-employed professional, locum fees are not to be paid unless an exception has been approved. The self-employed professional receives payment for body business only and reimbursement of travel expenses where relevant to body business. Additional payments are not provided to pay for the use of a locum or the business overheads since the body is not responsible for funding members’ own business costs. Issues such as the potential loss of income and maintenance of a professional practice (including business overheads) need to be considered by the individual prior to accepting appointment to a body.

55In their private capacity, members of some bodies covered by the Framework provide an essential service which cannot be maintained by other parts of their organisation while they are serving as members. A prime example is that of doctors working in general practice, especially where practices are busy, serve a community with high health needs, and locums are needed to ensure services are maintained. In such cases, the Framework should be used to guide the setting of fees, but flexibility may be allowed to enable the fees to meet the costs of essential cover, such as locums.

56Payment of compensation or any benefit for loss of office must not take place.

57Ex gratia payments and other benefits or rewards, which are in addition to fees, must not be paid to members of statutory boards, subsidiary bodies of statutory entities, statutory tribunals, authorities or other Crown bodies or committees.

Rates for sub-committees 

58Depending on its enabling legislation, a body may set up a sub-committee or sub-committees to carry out part of the body’s business.

59Members who receive an annual fee for membership do not receive any additional payment for membership of sub-committees.

60Members who receive a daily fee can receive payment for additional days spent on sub-committee work. If the sub-committee has been set up to consider an issue and report to the main body, then a lesser daily fee may be appropriate. Sub-committees must be properly constituted under the authorising legislation or terms of reference for the body before a meeting fee is paid.  

Independent members of sub-committees 

61Independent members of sub-committees are those members who are not members of the parent body. They may be paid up to a maximum of the daily equivalent of the full member fee, depending on the assessment by the main body of the skills required for the independent sub-committee member/s to perform their role. 

62An independent member who chairs a subcommittee shall be paid at the rate applicable to a member of the parent body who chairs a subcommittee.

63The daily fee for bodies whose members are paid an annual fee should be calculated by dividing the annual fee by the appropriate number of days worked, e.g. 30 for a general governance board (refer to paragraph 38 regarding assumption about workload for members paid an annual fee). 

64The total annual fee paid to an independent member of a sub-committee should not exceed 50 percent of the total annual fee paid to a member of the main body. 

65Any proposal to pay higher daily fees or total annual fees outside this guidance should be treated as an exception (see section E). This section does not apply to ex-officio members.

Rates for Chairs

66Rates for chairs are set within the applicable fee range at Section D. If no legislative impediment exists, co-chairs may be appointed. Applicable chair rates will apply to both. When a body is appointed without a chair, all members shall be paid at the same member rate.

Rates for deputy chairs and sub-committee chairs 

67Where the legislation provides for the appointment of a deputy chair and/or where the work of the body is such that the appointment of a deputy chair is required due to the complex nature or size of the responsibilities, then a fee additional to the member rate may be paid to the deputy chair.

68The fee for the responsibilities of a deputy chair is an additional 25 percent of the member rate. (This is consistent with the rates paid to deputy chairs in Crown companies and in the private sector.) If this takes the deputy chair fee above the fee range, it is not an exception.

69Where a deputy is acting as chair they should be paid a daily rate equivalent to that of the chair.

70Where there is no deputy appointed, and a member is required to chair a meeting, then the member should be paid a daily rate equivalent to that of the chair.

71Where an annual fee is paid, it is usual practice for the chair, and the deputy chair, where one is appointed, to have responsibility for chairing one or more sub-committees. No additional fee is payable to the chair and deputy chair for chairing sub-committees. Where there are sub-committees that are not chaired by either the chair or deputy chair, then an additional 10% of the member’s rate may be paid to one other member with responsibility for chairing a sub-committee. Any case for further additional payments for chairing sub-committees must be treated as an exception to the Framework (see section E).

One person committees

72Where an individual member constitutes a committee and there are decision-making or recommendatory powers, that member should receive the rate applicable to the chair of a body at that level.

Payments to public sector employees appointed to bodies covered by the Framework

73Paragraphs 73 to 79 apply in relation to public sector employees including public servants who may be appointed to a body covered by the Framework. In these paragraphs, the term “public sector employee means employees of Public Service agencies[1] Crown agents and employees of other statutory Crown entities (autonomous Crown entities and independent Crown entities), agencies in the wider public sector as well as other agencies associated with a Ministerial portfolio and any local authority as defined under section 5(1) of the Local Government Act 2002.

74These paragraphs reflect Cabinet’s agreement in 2012 that the Framework provides that any employee of a government agency, appointed in their own right to a body covered by the Framework, must not retain both the fee and their ordinary pay, where the duties of the outside organisation are undertaken during their ordinary working hours.

All public sector employees appointed to bodies covered by the Framework

75Public sector employees may be appointed to a body covered by the Framework either ex officio (someone who has a right because of an office held), or as a representative of their department or agency, or, where there are special circumstances, in their own right.

76All public sector employees appointed to statutory and other public bodies must be able to do their primary job unhindered and without detriment to the public interest. They must not be double paid for their job and their membership of a body covered by the Framework.

77For those it applies to and their employers should be aware of the principles in the Public Servants on Boards Guidance when considering fees. Where there are out of pocket expenses such as airfares or accommodation, these should be reimbursed to the employee on the same basis as for other members of the board.  

Special considerations for appointments of public service employees in their own right 

78Cabinet has recognised that there may be special circumstances in which employees of Public Service departments may be appointed to statutory and other public bodies: Cabinet Office Circular CO(02)5 applies to public servants of statutory bodies[2]. However, as a general rule, public servants of a monitoring agency should not serve on a Crown entity board that their agency monitors, nor should public servants serve on a board that has the same responsible Minister(s) as their agency.

79Before any public service employee seeks to be appointed to a body in their own right, the employee must first obtain the agreement of their agency chief executive. Such appointments are treated as secondary employment and, in the case of public servants, are subject to the oversight of the Te Tumu Whakarae mō Te Kawa Maataho Public Service Commissioner (the Commissioner).

Payment for advisory committees and affiliated bodies

80Advisory committees - Annual fees paid to Crown entity board members include their work on sub-committees. Advisory committees set up under the board’s establishment legislation are not classed as sub-committees and attract separate fee payments. Board members who have conjoint advisory committee membership may not claim two sets of fees when the board and committee conduct joint meetings, i.e. may not be double paid. If there is doubt about which fee is applicable, this should be resolved between the board and committee chairs ahead of time.

81Affiliated body membership - Board members may be appointed as members of an affiliated public body, eg an establishment board. From time-to-time, these bodies may conduct joint meetings with the member’s parent board. Prior to such meetings, and to avoid members being double-paid, the respective chairs should agree on how fees will be paid to joint members and what workload can reasonably be expected for the meeting(s).

Payment for time spent in travel to meetings/sittings or on body business (daily fees only)

82Members are not paid for time spent in travel to and from meetings or on body business, except in instances where a daily fee is paid, and the member has to travel for more than a total of three hours in the course of a normal business day of approximately 8 hours.

83The purpose of paying for travel time that is greater than three hours is to compensate for lost income during the business day. For example, a member may spend a few hours at a meeting but in doing so spends all day away from normal business activity, due to spending several hours travelling to and from the meeting.

84In circumstances where considerable time is involved in travel, this can be recognised by the chair, with the agreement of the servicing/accountable organisation. In these cases (and particularly where air travel is involved) the preparation and travelling time need to be considered together for payment purposes. Where considerable travel is frequently necessary to meet the requirements of the role, this should be recognised either by reducing the working time or paying for some or all of the travel time (see para 48).

85In considering payments for travelling time, the chair and servicing agency need to consider issues of equity, the government’s intention for geographical representation, and ensure that attendance at meetings does not result in undue personal hardship.

Childcare expenses

86Under exceptional circumstances a contribution may be made to childcare expenses with the agreement of the chair (or another member if the chair is claiming expenses) and the servicing agency. However, it is generally expected that the daily fee paid is adequate to meet out-of-pocket expenses of individual members as well as reimbursing them for their time spent. An example where a contribution to childcare expenses may be made is where an additional meeting is called at short notice (e.g. less than 48 hours). In determining whether payment is warranted, consideration should be given to issues of equity and ensuring that attendance at meetings does not result in undue personal hardship.

Payment of a fee for a cancelled meeting/sitting 

87Where a meeting or other activity of a statutory or other body is cancelled or takes fewer days than planned, in exceptional cases payment of the fee to certain members may be approved.

88Each case would need to be considered on its merits and this should only occur where:

  • the cancellation was unforeseeable;
  • the member was unable to reschedule other work to take advantage of the time made available; and
  • the member suffered real loss of income as a result of the cancellation.

89An affected member would need to make a case to the body on each separate occasion. Payment should not be approved if it is believed the member had not tried to reschedule other work. Partial payment might be appropriate if rescheduled appointment fees do not fully compensate a member for the lost fee from the meeting.

90If appropriate and the body did, on application from a member for a specific instance, resolve to pay the fee for part or all of the time a meeting was cancelled by, that resolution would need to be noted in the minutes.

Payment for meetings by teleconference

91Where a meeting is held by teleconference or video conference, the usual fees apply.

92Where a member is unable to attend a meeting in person but joins the meeting by teleconference or videoconference, with the agreement of the chair, the usual fees apply. If the member receives daily fees and participates in less than half of the meeting, an hourly pro-rata rate would apply (see paragraph 49).

Absence

93Where an individual receives an annual fee and is absent from body business for a period of greater than two months, then the annualised fee should be pro-rated to take account of this absence (e.g. an absence of 2 months would result in payment of 10/12 of the annual fee). Where there are frequent absences over the period of a year, the annual fee should also be pro-rated to take account of those absences. (This does not apply to members who work full time or substantially full time).

94Where a member fails to attend a significant number of meetings, or otherwise perform their duties as a member, the chair needs to raise the issue of expectations about performance with the member and, if necessary, with the responsible Minister. Consideration should be given at the time of reappointment of members to the issue of continued absences from body business.

Reimbursing expenses

95Members travelling to and from meetings, or on the business of the body in which the Crown has an interest (where the members are required to be away from their normal places of residence), are entitled to reimbursement of out of pocket travelling, meal and accommodation expenses actually and reasonably incurred. The expectation is that standards of travel, accommodation, meals and other expenses are modest and appropriate to reflect public sector norms.

96Actual and reasonable travel, meals, accommodation and other expenses incurred by the member in carrying out the business of the body in which the Crown has an interest may be reimbursed provided they are supported by appropriate documentation.

97Where it would not be reasonable to travel by public transport and a member’s private motor vehicle is used for travel to and from meetings, or on the business of the body in which the Crown has an interest, reimbursement will be at the Kilometre rates specified by Inland Revenue.

Note

  1. [1] Section 10(a) of the Public Service Act defines Public Service agencies as departments, departmental agencies, interdepartmental executive boards and interdepartmental ventures.
  2. [2] The Commission maintains an up to date list of all of the organisations of the public sector and their categorisation.

Section D: Classification of bodies and fee scales

98The Framework provides for the classification of bodies into one of the following groups:

  • Group 1: Royal Commissions, Public Inquiries, Government Inquiries and Ministerial Inquiries;
  • Group 2: Statutory Tribunals and Authorities;
  • Group 3: Governance Boards:
    • Group 3a: General Governance Boards (including TEIs);
    • Group 3b: Subsidiary Bodies of Statutory Entities (e.g.. of Crown Agents, ACEs, ICEs);
  • Group 4: All Other Committees and Other Bodies
    • Audit and Risk Committees - Government Departments.

    99Cabinet has agreed to a schedule of fees for all categories that reflects the nature of their business environment and the role requirements.

    100Once a decision has been made on which group the organisation best fits into, establish the level within the group (see classification process below for each group), and then find the fee range for that level in the appropriate table. A decision is then required on what amount, within (or below) the ranges provided, is most appropriate. Section C, particularly paragraph 30, provides guidance on how to make these decisions. Further assistance is available from the Commission.

    101Refer to section E if the proposed fee is above the ranges provided, or an alternative method of payment is proposed.

    Group 1: Royal Commissions, Public Inquiries, Government Inquiries and Ministerial Inquiries

    102Royal Commissions, public inquiries, government inquiries and Ministerial inquiries are time-limited bodies established to inquire into and report on specific matters. Royal Commissions and public inquiries are generally chaired by a judge or a retired judge.

    103The key distinction between a Royal Commission, a public inquiry, government inquiry and a Ministerial inquiry lies in the form of the instrument of appointment and the nature of the authority under which it is established: 

    • Royal Commissions are appointed by the Governor-General, pursuant to the Letters Patent Constituting the Office of the Governor-General of New Zealand 1983 and the Inquiries Act 2013. Royal Commissions are, therefore, generally regarded as having greater prestige and standing than public inquiries appointed under the Inquiries Act 2013 alone. A Royal Commission is generally appointed when the subject matter to be investigated is one of particular public importance. The final report is presented to the Governor-General and the House of Representatives.
    • Public inquiries are established by the Governor-General by order in Council pursuant to the Inquiries Act 2013. The final report is presented to the Governor-General and the House of Representatives.
    • Government inquiries are established by a Minister or Ministers by notice in the Gazette pursuant to the Inquiries Act 2013. The final report is presented to the appointing Minister.
    • Ministerial Inquiries are non-statutory inquiries established by a Minister. The Prime Minister’s agreement must be sought on all matters to do with the establishment of a Ministerial Inquiry. (Refer DPMC Guidance on inquiries).

    104A Minister must consult the Prime Minister and the Attorney-General when assessing whether to establish a Royal Commission, public inquiry or government inquiry prior to submitting any proposal to Cabinet (Chapter 4 of the Cabinet Manual).

    105If a Royal Commission, public inquiry, government inquiry or ministerial inquiry is proposed, the Commission should be contacted for advice about the proposed fee, prior to the appointment being considered by APH and Cabinet. All fees for Royal Commissions, public inquiries, government inquiries and ministerial inquiries must be referred to the Minister for the Public Service for consideration as an exception.

    Group 2: Statutory Tribunals and Authorities

    106Statutory tribunals and authorities are a broad and diverse group of adjudicative bodies that decide or resolve some form of question or dispute affecting the rights of parties. They exercise a defined specialist jurisdiction under legislative authority and decide cases by considering facts and evidence and applying settled rules or principles. They are not courts, but equally are independent from the executive (that is, their members are not departmental officers).

    Factors – choose one score from each of the following categories 

    107Expertise required

    Skills, knowledge and experience may vary between members on a particular tribunal. The score below should reflect the level of skill required by the majority of members and should not be based on any particular individual. This factor has a higher weighting than others, to reflect that it is the application of the skills, knowledge and experience in carrying out their responsibilities that is a major contributor to the successful operation of the tribunal or authority.

    108If a member is a sole member, the Chair fee range may be used, but in setting the actual fee level, the factors to be considered in setting or reviewing fees (paragraph 30) should be taken into account.

    Expertise required Score

    Expert and highly regarded in a particular field or discipline.

    9

    Senior professional providing expertise in a particular field or discipline.

    7

    Broad general or professional experience. May include community leadership.

    5

    109Complexity

    This dimension measures the problems typically faced by the tribunal and the mental processes required to arrive at the solution.

    Complexity Score

    Very complex issues with no past decisions for guidance. Each situation will be significantly different to others and the solution required is often unique. Decisions may affect the application of multiple statutes.

    5

    Some issues will be very complex with few previous decisions for guidance. Decisions will usually be limited to a single statute but may involve the application of international conventions and covenants.

    4

    Complex issues requiring analysis and consideration of potential alternative solutions. While each case will be treated on its merits there will often be previous decisions for guidance.

    3

    Some issues will be complex requiring analysis and careful judgement but other issues will be straightforward and may be resolved quickly through consistent application of established decisions.

    2

    Situations require consideration and judgement, but usually under one statute and established guidelines.

    1

    110Decision-making 

    Decision-making Score

    Primary function is as an appellate body. Decisions will usually be published. May have the power to fine, award costs etc.

    5

    Primary function is as a determining body. Decisions will usually be published. No penalty provisions. Judicial review of decisions may exist.

    4

    Power to make decisions – appeal processes available. Has power to fine, award costs etc.

    3

    Power to make decisions – appeal processes available. No penalty or fining authority.

    2

    Recommendatory powers only.

    1

    111Impact of decisions

    Impact of decisions Score

    An immediate impact on groups of people or sector/s of society.

    5

    An immediate, critical impact on an individual or small number of people.

    4

    Decisions have an immediate, but not critical effect on a small number of individuals or a single corporate entity.

    3

    Decisions have a longer term impact on groups of people or sector/s of society.

    2

    Decisions affect internal policies within a Department/Ministry.

    1

    112Public profile

    Public profile Score

    High profile; broad public interest and scrutiny likely. May involve challenging status of legislation. Potential impact on New Zealand’s international reputation.

    5

    Moderate profile; strong interest likely from large sectors of the public. Decisions of the Tribunal may have a major effect on the supervising Government Department.

    4

    Medium profile; public interest likely to be localised to area, sector or discipline.

    3

    Limited profile; usually non- controversial determinations but of interest to small pressure groups.

    2

    Low profile; generally non-controversial findings or recommendations.

    1

    Add the scores for each factor together to give a total score. Then refer to the table below for the ranges of fees payable for Group 2 bodies.

    113Group 2 - daily fees

    Total score Level Fees range – chair Fees range – members

    26-29

    1

    $765 - $1,194

    $490 - $759

    22-25

    2

    $693 - $1,018

    $451 - $627

    17-21

    3

    $633 - $858

    $402 - $561

    13-16

    4

    $534 - $666

    $347 - $429

    12 or less

    5

    $402 - $594

    $319 - $385

    Group 3:  Governance Boards

    114These boards are primarily responsible for the governance of a Crown body or organisation (most Crown entities fall into this category). In many cases, the body will be established by or under an Act that sets out its statutory purpose or objectives and principal functions.  

    115Governance boards have responsibility for the strategic direction of the organisation, the determination of business objectives and formulation of policies to achieve these objectives, and funding policy. A large number will also have the task to recruit, appoint and monitor the chief executive. Where the board is overseeing an interest owned by the Crown, the board is usually the link between the shareholder/owner (the Crown) and management, and its members are appointed either by a Minister/the government or the Governor-General. In some cases, boards have elected members, or members appointed by stakeholders other than the Minister. The organisation the board is overseeing may or may not be a company.

    116A number of Trust Boards also fit into this category.

    Group 3a: General Governance Boards (including TEIs)

    Factors - choose one score from each of the following categories (noting paragraph 115).

    117Size

    Select either the appropriate budget/turnover or asset magnitude figure that best represents the size of the organisation. Lower weighting is given for asset management than budget controlled as assets have been accumulated over time, are retained by the organisation and the Board’s responsibility is the safe guardianship and the most effective and sustainable deployment of assets. Budgets on the other hand are expended over a twelve-month period and the Board’s accountability for this spend, or revenue earned, is more direct.

    Please note that funding disbursements and purchases on behalf of the Crown are treated in the same manner as operating budgets.

    Budget/turnover Assets Score

    $0-$10m

    $0-$100m

    2

    $10m-$50m

    $100m-$500m

    4

    $50m-$100m

    $500m-$1.0b

    6

    $100m-$300m

    $1.0b-$3b

    8

    $300m-$600m

    $3b-$6b

    10

    $600m-$1.2b

    $6b-$12b

    12

    $1.2b+

    $12b+

    14

    118Business complexity/functionality 

    Select the organisation’s primary function, and then consider and assess the complexity of that primary function in accordance with the following tables.

    Where the organisation clearly has more than one primary function, as identified in its legislation or its Minister’s expectations, and where neither/none of the primary functions are dependent on other primary roles, each role may be assessed, scored independently, and the scores added together following consultation with the Commission.

    Option Primary function

    Devolved Purchaser

    An entity that specialises in making purchase decisions on behalf of the Crown. There will almost certainly be a contractual relationship between the entity and the provider of services.

    Funding
    Disbursement

    An entity established to distribute grants or funding.

    Investment and Management of
    Funds

    An entity involved in the investment and management of funds on behalf of the Crown or for beneficiaries.

    Advisory to Crown

    An entity advisory to the Crown at a significant level.

    Regulatory

    An entity exercising regulatory and/or quasi-judicial power in an independent and objective manner.

    Provider of Services and Environment

    An entity established to provide services. The level of competition for the services will vary, and there may be limits on competition prescribed by statute or otherwise.

    Holder of
    Ownership Interest

    The holder of the Crown’s ownership interest.

    Social Influence 

    An entity established to improve a social outcome or outcomes through encouraging behaviour change (e.g. healthy lifestyle choices) by promotion of activities and increasing public awareness.

    Devolved purchaser
    Primary function Score

    Devolved purchaser of goods and services ($10b+)

    5

    Devolved purchaser ($1b-$10b)

    4

    Devolved purchaser ($100m-$1b)

    3

    Devolved purchaser ($20m-$100m)

    2

    Devolved purchaser (under $20m)

    1

    OR

    Funding disbursement
    Primary function Score

    Funding disbursement ($10b+)

    5

    Funding disbursement ($1b-$10b)

    4

    Funding disbursement ($100m-$1b)

    3

    Funding disbursement ($20m-$100m)

    2

    Funding disbursement (under $20m)

    1

    OR

    Investment and management of funds
    Primary function Score

    Investment management of funds (over $5b)

    5

    Investment management of funds (over $1b)

    4

    Investment management of funds (over $500m)

    3

    Investment management of funds (over $100m)

    2

    Investment management of funds (under $100m)

    1

    OR

    Advisory to Crown
    Primary function Score

    Critical level with a comprehensive effect on most/all aspects of government activity, strategy and New Zealand society

    5

    Significant level with a widespread impact across many aspects of government activity, planning and strategy

    4

    Important level with generalised impact across major sectors

    3

    Generalised impact across several sectors

    2

    Local or single sector impact

    1

    OR

    Regulatory
    Primary function Score

    National safety regulatory function for a commercial trading environment where significant international dimensions can impact on operating capability

    5

    National safety regulatory function for a commercial trading environment

    4

    National safety regulatory function for a non-commercial trading environment

    3

    Regulatory

    2

    Minor regulations required

    1

    OR

    Provider of services and environment
    Primary function Score

    The lead provider of services in a commercial trading environment, where market leadership is important

    5

    A provider of services in a commercial trading environment

    4

    The major provider of services where there is limited competition

    3

    A provider of services where there is limited competition

    2

    Provider of services (not in a competitive environment or protected by statute)

    1

    OR

    Holder of ownership interest
    Primary function Score

    The holder of the Crown’s ownership interest

    1

    OR

    Social influence
    Primary function Score

    Promote behaviour change and increase public awareness for all or most of the population, and have a measurable, beneficial, influence on a substantial segment of the population

    5

    Promote behaviour change and increase public awareness for all or most of the population, or have a significant influence on a more limited but still substantial segment of the population

    4

    Promote behaviour change and increase public awareness in a substantial segment of the population, and have a significant influence on a limited segment of the population

    3

    Promote behaviour change and increase public awareness in a substantial segment of the population

    2

    Promote behaviour change and increase public awareness in a limited segment of the population

    1

    Add the scores for “size” and one “business complexity/ functionality” together to give a total score. (Consult the Commission about having more than one primary function). Refer to the guidance in section C and the table below for the ranges of fees payable for Group 3a bodies.

    119Group 3a – annual fees

    Total score Level Fees range – chair Fees range – members

    21-24

    1

    $40,596 - $90,123

    $20,295 - $44,655

    15-20

    2

    $34,623 - $73,552

    $17,309 - $36,773

    11-14

    3

    $31,042 - $53,730

    $15,521 - $26,829

    7-10

    4

    $28,655 - $40,117

    $14,328 - $20,251

    6 or less

    5

    $14,328 - $30,085

    $7,161 - $15,615

    Group 3b: Subsidiary Bodies of Statutory Entities

    120The boards of statutory entities (i.e. the parent boards) set the fees for their subsidiary board members. The statutory entities are Crown Agents, ACEs and ICEs listed in Schedule 1 of the Crown Entities Act 2004.

    121Size

    The following two size criteria are consistent with the protocol for General Governance Boards (Group 3a) above (see paragraph 117).

    Select either the appropriate budget/turnover or asset magnitude figure that best represents the size of the organisation. Lower weighting is given for asset management than budget controlled as assets have been accumulated over time, are retained by the organisation and the body’s responsibility is the safe guardianship and the most effective and sustainable deployment of assets. Budgets on the other hand are expended over a twelve-month period and the body’s accountability for this spend, or revenue earned is more direct.

    Please note that funding disbursements and purchases on behalf of the Crown are treated in the same manner as operating budgets.

    Budget/turnover Assets Score

    $0-$10m

    $0-$100m

    2

    $10m-$50m

    $100m-$500m

    4

    $50m-$100m

    $500m-$1.0b

    6

    $100m-$300m

    $1.0b-$3b

    8

    $300m-$600m

    $3b-$6b

    10

    $600m-$1.2b

    $6b-$12b

    12

    $1.2b+

    $12b+

    14

    Refer to the guidelines in section C and the table below for the ranges of fees payable for Group 3b bodies.

    122Group 3b – annual fees

    Total score Level Fees range – chair Fees range – members

    10 – 14

    1

    $27,462 - $43,841

    $13,728 - $21,918

    6 – 9

    2

    $25,669 - $41,102

    $12,832 - $20,548

    5 or less

    3

    $22,088 - $36,839

    $11,044 - $18,420

    Group 4: All Other Committees and Other Bodies

    123This category covers a vast array of bodies from advisory committees to technical review committees to professional regulatory bodies. These bodies may have their functions described in statute, or alternatively have been established by a Minister under a general statutory power to establish advisory committees or by the Cabinet. In other cases, the bodies will have been established by chief executives or governance boards of agencies to provide advice on the agency’s functions and responsibilities on a general basis or on specific areas or issues.

    124The level within this category is determined by:

    • skills, knowledge and experience required for members;
    • function, level and scope of authority;
    • complexity of issues;
    • public interest and profile.

    Factors – choose one score from each of the following categories

    125Skills, knowledge and experience

    Skills, knowledge and experience will vary between members on a particular body. The score below should reflect the level of skill required by the majority of members and should not be based on any particular individual. This factor has a higher weighting than others, to reflect that it is the application of the skills, knowledge and experience in carrying out their responsibilities that is a major contributor to the successful operation of the committee or body.

    Skills, knowledge and experience Definition Score

    Pre–eminent

    Outstanding and authoritative knowledge, recognised nationally and internationally for expertise in a particular field.

    12

    Distinguished

    Deep and broad knowledge in a specific area or as a leader. Widely respected as a subject matter expert or authority in their field.

    10

    Substantive

    Substantial range of knowledge and experience in a field or professional discipline sometimes associated with senior level functional or technical leadership, executive management or governance roles. May include widely respected people with broad community support.

    8

    Technical

    A number of years’ experience in a technical, professional field or in a leadership role is a pre-requisite.

    6

    Specialised experience

    No specific experience is required but members would have broad general knowledge and may represent a body of opinion.

    4

    126Function, level and scope of authority

    Function, level and scope of authority Score

    Sets policy or work programme for a major area of economic activity or policy area of importance to the Government’s strategic priorities.

    6

    Sets policy or work programme and/or exercises regulatory/disciplinary powers at an industry level.

    5

    Provides expert counsel and advice direct to Ministers, agency governance boards or CEOs and/or multi-agency task forces on technical or major policy issues, where issues are of strategic importance. At this level the body would be expected to be proactive in identifying emerging issues and contributing to policy direction and to inform the Government’s agenda

    4

    Exercises regulatory/disciplinary powers at the individual/professional level. This will include the power to impose fines and suspend or prohibit professional practice by the individual.
    (NB: This would include an individual corporate member.)

    3

    Provides a broad range of advice on technical and/or policy issues (multi outputs) to an agency governance board/CEO or Minister where issues affect Government policy.

    2

    Provides ad hoc advice to an agency governance board/CEO or Minister on minor matters. Generally a limited focus at a single output level. 

    127Complexity of issues

    Complexity of issues Definition Score

    Innovative

    The development of new concepts is required to find innovative and pathfinding solutions. There will be little or no external guidance (NZ or internationally) to aid resolution of these issues.

    5

    Constructive

    The development of new policy or advice is required where the issues are complex, multi- dimensional and involve substantial research, consideration of possible alternatives and their consequences. The body may commission research or utilise the findings to inform their policy development or advice.

    4

    Evaluative

    Issues will include circumstances, facts and concepts different to those that have been experienced in the past. Analytical thinking and evaluative judgement will be required to identify realistic alternatives and apply/recommend a solution.

    3

    Judgement

    Solutions will be found from application of professional or personal judgement and generally guided by previous decisions. Circumstances may be different from those previously experienced but there will be a sufficient frame of reference to make a considered decision/recommendation.

    2

    Operational

    Issues to be resolved are generally within existing policy and prior decisions. Decisions can generally be made quickly and with reasonable certainty.

    1

    128Public interest and profile

    Public interest and profile Score

    Widespread public interest in outcomes would be expected. Member/s will attract strong media interest. Potential risk to personal and/or the body’s reputation is high.

    5

    Strong public and stakeholder interest and importance would be associated with these issues. Media interest would also be expected, but potential risk to personal or the body’s reputation is unlikely.

    4

    Moderate but widespread public interest is likely. Reputational risk is minimal.

    3

    Public interest is likely to be limited, but the issues would be of interest to other members of the particular profession or sector.

    2

    There is likely to be little or no wider public interest in the decisions. 

    1

    Add the scores for each factor together to give a total score. Then refer to the guidance in section C and the table below for the ranges of fees payable for Group 4 bodies.

    129Group 4 – daily fees

    Total score Level Fees range – chair Fees range – members

    24-28

    1

    $594 - $1,265

    $446 - $952

    20-23

    2

    $429 - $974

    $319 - $616

    15-19

    3

    $308 - $633

    $226 - $435

    10-14

    4

    $275 - $402

    $209 - $297

    9 or less

    5

    $226 - $292

    $165 - $226

    Audit and Risk Committees - Government Departments

    130Most agencies have established audit and risk committees (or their equivalent). All or almost all of the chairs and members of these committees are external to the agency and they are generally not public sector employees. Due to the skill and expertise required of external chairs and members of these committees and the complexity of the matters on which they advise, higher fees for agency audit and risk committees have been approved. (The Office of the Auditor-General provides advice on audit committees).

    131Fees for chairs of audit and risk committees can be up to $1,430 per day and fees for members can be up to $1,195 per day (up to a maximum of 30 days per annum in both cases).

    Section E: Operating outside the parameters of the Framework/ exceptions to the Framework

    132Operating outside the parameters of the Framework includes situations where it is proposed to:

    • pay fees above the levels set in the fee scales;
    • increase existing fees by more than 5% (even within the applicable fee range);
    • use alternative methods for paying or setting fees (for example, payment of a base honorarium plus a fee for additional services, Crown bodies setting their own fees from a total pool, a full-time fee);
    • make additional payments for work in excess of the ordinary demands on body members;
    • make additional payments to chairs of sub-committees (see paragraphs 67 to 71).

    133Where Ministers, agencies or other fee-setting authorities believe there is a case to operate outside the parameters of the Framework (except where proposed fees are below the Framework fee ranges), they must consult with the Minister for the Public Service. Proposals to pay fees outside the parameters of the Framework range should first be discussed with the Commission.

    134The following flowchart summarises the process to use when there is a need to operate outside the parameters of the Framework and for fees for all Group 1 bodies.

    Seeking Exceptions - Flowchart

    135The details required to justify an exception to the Framework include the classification of the body, the existing fee levels (if applicable), the fee setting authority, and the reason for seeking an exception.

    136A compelling case is required to support the payment of fees above the levels set in the fee scales. Justification should include evidence of an adequate, robust and appropriate selection process and consideration of potential candidates, any difficulties in recruitment or retention, and/or particular skills and expertise that are required for a specific task. Further advice is available from the Commission.

    137The Minister for the Public Service may agree to the proposal, or may recommend to the responsible Minister that the fee needs to be referred to APH and Cabinet, where a responsible Minister proposes an exception which is:

    • minor (including but not limited to):
      • where an additional payment is indicated for specified additional work; or
      • where the additional cost involved in an exception is small; or
      • where the exception is of modest scope;

    or:

    • technical (including but not limited to):
      • where a change from a daily payment to an annual fee is proposed because of predictability of workload, or where a change from an annual fee to a daily payment is proposed;

    or where:

    • the proposed daily fees for Group 1, 2 and 4 bodies are above the Framework range but the rationale for the proposed fee is strong and does not exceed the daily fee payable to a High Court Judge; or
    • an increase up to 10 percent (see section F) is within the applicable fee range and supported by strong rationale.

    138Where an exception is more substantial, the responsible Minister will refer the proposal for consideration by APH and Cabinet, after consultation with the Minister for the Public Service.

    139For exceptions for agency bodies or committees, the agency consults the responsible Minister and the Minister for the Public Service.

    140If the fee setting authority is a statutory entity (i.e. Crown Agent, or ACE) then it should consult its monitoring agency, responsible Minister and the Minister for the Public Service (with advice from the Commission). For exceptions for subsidiary bodies, the parent entity consults its monitoring agency, the responsible Minister and the Minister for the Public Service (with advice from the Commission).

    141If there is a difference of view between the responsible Minister and the Minister for the Public Service about the appropriate fee levels, the options should be presented to APH.

    Standing exceptions

    142A small number of exceptions to the fee ranges in the Framework have been approved by Cabinet where unusual circumstances, particularly the complexities and functions associated with membership, make it appropriate to pay fees outside the Framework range to the members of that body.  

    143Standing exceptions are those exceptions where APH has agreed that those exceptional fees can be paid to all new appointments and reappointments to that body without the need to refer to Cabinet for further approval.

    144Where an agency considers that a body for which they are responsible should be considered for a standing exception, they should discuss the justification for seeking a standing exception with the Commission in the first instance. The Commission will advise on whether the circumstances are likely to meet the threshold for approval as a standing exception. The responsible Minister, in consultation with the Minister for the Public Service, will then seek the agreement of APH to the standing exception.

    145Any proposal to increase the fees once the standing exception has been approved would be subject to additional approval.

    146A standing exception can also be sought for technical exceptions (see paragraph 137), e.g. annualising daily fees or pro rating annual fees, and extending an exceptional fee for a defined period.

    147Technical exceptions do not generally need to be referred to Cabinet, so the responsible Minister can seek agreement from the Minister for the Public Service.

    148The Commission maintains a record of standing exceptions. Agencies should advise the Commission of any standing exceptions which are approved by APH to enable the Commission to maintain accurate records.

    Grandparenting of existing fees

    149When changes to a body’s responsibilities lead to the body’s reclassification to a lower fee range, approval may be given, on a case-by-case basis, for existing body members to retain their existing fees. Fees approved for an individual body member at a higher level than the fee range of this Framework may remain at the higher level for the duration of the member’s term of appointment provided the basis for justifying the exception is still valid.

    150Where possible, a time limit should be set when grandparenting is approved (e.g. a specified period or until the position is vacated). Where the term of a grandparenting arrangement has expired but the basis for justifying the exception is still valid, the responsible Minister and the Minister for the Public Service may approve the extension of grandparenting as a technical exception.

    151Grandparenting of fees applies only to the individual member for whom it is approved and not to the position. It is an exception to the principle in paragraph 33 that members of the same body receive the same fee. A new member appointed to the body must not receive the grandparented fee unless this has been specifically approved for the new member.

    152Information about any grandparenting arrangements, including changes to or extensions to existing arrangements will be sought through the Commission’s triennial fees survey.

    Payment for consulting 

    153Members or other appointees should not receive payments as consultants from bodies to which they are appointed. If, however, the responsible Minister agrees that there are overriding reasons for members and other appointees to carry out consulting assignments, any proposal to do so should be submitted to APH and Cabinet for consideration.  

    154Where the arrangement results in the risk of a conflict of interest, the Minister should identify the conflict in the submission to APH and propose a suitable regime for managing the conflict. See the Commission’s Model Standards on Conflicts of Interest, and Board Appointment and Induction Guidelines, sections 31 and 62 of the Crown Entities Act 2004, and the appointments section of the CabGuide for further guidance on conflicts of interest.

    155If a person or their spouse or partner is a member of a local authority or public body listed in Schedule 1 of the Local Authorities (Members’ Interests) Act 1968, their membership may be affected by entering into a contract with the local authority or public body if the total of all payments under such contracts exceeds the amount specified in that Act. In these cases approval of the Auditor-General must be obtained in addition to the Cabinet approval required by this Framework (see section 3 of the Local Authorities (Members’ Interests) Act 1968).

    Section F: Reviewing existing fee levels 

    156Fee-setting authorities should review fees at regular, reasonable intervals, such as after a review of the Framework or when an appointment or reappointment is pending, and not more frequently than once a year. There is no obligation to automatically increase the fee as a result of the review.

    157Changes to existing fee levels should be made by the fee-setting authority if it is necessary to address recruitment and retention problems, where the current fee levels do not adequately reflect levels of responsibility, or where fees have not been reviewed for a number of years. Changes also need to reflect the government’s expectation that increases in public sector remuneration will be modest.

    158This may mean that increases to reflect levels of responsibility are done incrementally (rather than in one step), but not more often than once a year. Where a proposed increase is up to 3 percent and within the applicable fee range, the chief executive or governance board of the agency may approve the increase for bodies established by the chief executive or governance board.

    159Where a proposed increase is up to 5 percent and within the applicable fee range, the responsible Minister may approve the increase. Any increase above 5 percent or outside the applicable fee range is an exception to the Framework and requires consultation with the Minister for the Public Service.

    160Where a proposed increase is up to 10 percent and within the applicable fee range, the Minister for the Public Service may approve the increase. Where a proposed increase is greater than 10 percent or the proposed increase takes the fees above the applicable fee range, the proposal must be referred to Cabinet for consideration (see section E). For further advice please contact the Commission.

    161When existing fees are being reviewed, the steps required to classify the body (see section D) should be undertaken to confirm the classification and level of the body.

    162Backdating of increases should generally be avoided. However, in some cases, such as where there has been undue delay in approving the increase, backdating may be appropriate. Approval for backdating must be sought from the authority approving the fee increase. For guidance on particular cases please consult the Commission.

    Section G: Other

    Indemnity and insurance

    163The legislation establishing some Crown bodies provides board members with explicit protection from liability in some circumstances. The nature of the protection varies according to the body and reference should be made to the appropriate legislation.

    164The Crown Entities Act 2004 contains standard provisions on immunity from liability, indemnity and insurance in relation to board members, employees, office holders, and committee members of statutory entities. Statutory entities are Crown Agents, ACEs and ICEs listed in Schedule 1 of the Crown Entities Act 2004.

    165The extent to which a body in which the Crown has an interest may indemnify or purchase insurance for its personnel to meet their legal expenses while working for the body may be dealt with specifically in the body’s enabling Act or document. Where it is not, then the general powers of the body must be checked to determine whether it has the power to indemnify or purchase insurance for its members.

    166The Crown Entities Act 2004 requirements for statutory entity indemnities and insurance provide a good yardstick for other bodies, subject to their own particular enabling Acts. The Crown Entities Act 2004 provides that entities may only indemnify their members for acts or omissions in good faith and in performance or intended performance of the entity’s functions. Any such indemnity is limited to liability for conduct, and costs incurred in defending or settling any claim or proceeding relating to that liability. An entity may purchase insurance cover for its members in relation to acts or omissions unless they are in bad faith or not in performance or intended performance of the entity’s functions.

    167In the event that insurance is not provided, the body must ensure that the individual is made aware that he or she is not covered, as well as of any relevant statutory protection from liability, so they can consider whether to make their own provision for such insurance.

    Employment status

    168Members of boards of statutory bodies, statutory tribunals, authorities or other bodies are generally appointed by the Crown, governance boards or chief executives, or elected by voters. Members of the boards of subsidiary bodies of statutory entities (i.e. of Crown Agents, ACEs, ICEs) are generally appointed by their parent body. Members are not employees of the body or the Crown. The appointment as a member does not alter the individual’s employment status prior to the appointment (e.g. self-employed, employee, not employed).

    Tax on fees paid to a board member

    169How taxation applies to any fees paid to members depends on the personal circumstances of the individual board member and the terms of their contract/appointment. Depending on the circumstances an employer/payer could be required to deduct withholding tax from payments made to board members.

    170A discussion (provided by Inland Revenue) of the application of withholding tax and/or GST to fees paid to the board member can be found here.

    171If, after considering this discussion, you still have queries about the correct tax treatment of particular fees paid, contact Denise Birdling, Team Leader, Crown, Significant Enterprises, Inland Revenue (denise.birdling@ird.govt.nz).

    Disclosure

    172Any statutory requirements for the disclosure of fees and other benefits must be met. Crown entities, other than Tertiary Education Institutions or schools, must meet the disclosure requirements of section 152 of the Crown Entities Act 2004. Where there are no statutory or other specified requirements, a level of disclosure consistent with public accountability should apply.

    Fiscal implications

    173Any proposed fees or payments for bodies covered by the Framework should be met within existing baselines or appropriations unless approval for the additional expenditure has been appropriated or otherwise authorised.

    Cabinet committee submissions 

    174In general, all but the most minor appointments made by Ministers, or by the Governor- General on the recommendation of Ministers, should first be considered by APH. Even where an appointment is the responsibility of a particular Minister, it is important that it is raised with colleagues to ensure the widest possible input into the appointment process. Please refer to the CabGuide.

    175Section E “Operating outside the Parameters of the Framework” refers to the circumstances in which exceptions to this Framework are referred to APH and Cabinet before final decisions are made. In those cases where the responsible Minister proposes fees outside the parameters of the Framework, the submission should note that consultation with the Minister for the Public Service has taken place, and should outline the basis for going outside the parameters of the Framework.

    176If there is a difference of view between the responsible Minister and the Minister for the Public Service about the appropriate fee levels, the options should be presented to APH.

    177In these cases, appointments should not be made until fee levels have been agreed. Please also refer to the CabGuide.

    Further information 

    178For advice on the application and interpretation of the fees framework, contact Te Kawa Mataaho Public Service Commission, email: fees@publicservice.govt.nz or phone (04) 495 6600.

    179For advice on taxation on fees, contact Denise Birdling, Team Lead, Significant Enterprises, Inland Revenue email: Denise.Birdling@ird.govt.nz or phone (04) 890 6295.

    Glossary of Terms

    Agency
    a Public Service department, Crown agent, Autonomous Crown entity or Tertiary Education Institution that may support Ministers to establish bodies and / or establish bodies itself, and therefore is responsible for applying the Framework.
    Autonomous Crown Entity
    one of the three types of statutory entities defined in the Crown Entities Act 2004, Autonomous Crown entities must have regard to government policy that relates to their functions and objectives when directed by the responsible Minister. Autonomous Crown entities are listed in Part 2 of Schedule 1 of the Crown Entities Act 2004 and are covered by the Framework.
    Bodies in which the Crown has an interest
    this term is used in several Acts to apply the Cabinet Fees Framework to a body or bodies named in the Act, but the term is not defined. It is generally understood to:
    • be broader than ‘government agency’ if that term is synonymous with agencies that operate within the executive branch of government, or that operate as instruments under direct or indirect Ministerial control or direction, or where the body or individual is appointed by a Minister or department
    • encompass certain bodies and individuals in the judicial branch of government
    • include bodies and individuals that carry out some aspect of the business or responsibilities of central government, or that scrutinise or investigate or assist the agencies that do so directly.
    Consultant and Contractor
    definitions can be found on the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment’s website at Consultant vs contractor.
    Crown Agent
    one of the 3 types of statutory entities defined in the Crown Entities Act 2004, Crown agents must give effect to government policy that relates to their functions and objectives when directed by the responsible Minister. Crown agents are listed in Part 1 of Schedule 1of the Crown Entities Act 2004 and are covered by the Framework.
    Crown entity
    includes any entity within the 5 categories specified in the Crown Entities Act 2004, e.g. statutory entities, Crown entity companies, Crown entity subsidiaries, school boards of trustees and tertiary education institutions. Only some Crown entities are covered by the Framework (see paragraph 20).
    Crown entity companies
    companies incorporated under the Companies Act 1993 that are wholly owned by the Crown and named in Schedule 2 of the Crown Entities Act 2004. Crown entity companies are not covered by the Framework.
    Department
    in the Framework the term “department” is used for Public Service departments including departmental agencies as specified in section 5 of the Public Service Act 2020. The term “agency” has been used in the generic sense. The term “monitoring agency” is used to refer to the entity responsible for ministerial support and administration.
    Exception
    an exception applies when approval is given to vary the Framework fee-setting parameters for a particular body. Section E of the Framework sets out the circumstances that might give rise to an exception. In some circumstances, the responsible Minister and the Minister for the Public Service can approve the exception, but other exceptions require approval by APH or Cabinet.
    Minor exception - where an additional payment is appropriate for specified additional work, where the additional cost is small or the exception is of modest scope it may be approved by the responsible Minister and the Minister for the Public Service.
    Standing exception - an exception approved by APH for all members of an individual body without requiring further approval for each appointment or reappointment.
    Technical exception - where an exception is cost neutral and supported by a sound rationale (e.g. the conversion from annual to daily fees or vice-versa due to a change in the meeting regime for a body) it may be approved by the responsible Minister and the Minister for the Public Service. Proposals for annual fees for Group 1, 2 and 4 bodies and extensions to grandparenting arrangements are also technical exceptions.
    Expenses
    provision for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred on body business, including travelling, meal and accommodation expenses.
    Fee-setting authority
    the position(s) or organisation that has the authority to set fees for a body covered by the Framework. In most cases for Group 1, 2 and 3a bodies, the fee-setting authority is the responsible Minister, in consultation with the Minister for the Public Service or APH. In the case of subsidiaries and sub-committees it is the parent entity. In the case of Group 4 bodies, the fee setting authority may be the governance board or chief executive of an agency.
    Fee range
    the minimum and maximum fees applicable to the chair and members of a body within the particular category.
    Governance board
    the board that is responsible for the governance of a body that comes under the Framework.
    Government inquiry
    a time-limited body established to inquire into and report on specific matters whose members are appointed by a Minister or Ministers pursuant to the Inquiries Act 2013.
    Grandparenting
    refers to payments where approval has been given, on a case-by-case basis and for a specified time period, for an existing body member(s) to retain their existing fees when changes to a body’s responsibilities lead to the body’s reclassification to a lower fee range.
    Honorarium
    a financial payment made to acknowledge a service provided which is considerably less than the value of that service.
    Independent Crown Entity
    one of the three types of statutory entities defined in the Crown Entities Act 2004, independent Crown entities are generally independent of government policy directions. Independent Crown entities are listed in Part 3 of Schedule 1 of the Crown Entities Act 2004 and are not covered by the Framework (apart from reimbursement for expenses), although their subsidiaries are covered by the Framework.
    Monitoring agency
    assists the responsible Minister in making appointments and applying the Framework, and monitoring the performance of the body. It may also provide administrative services to the body. The monitoring agency is usually a government department but may also be a Crown entity or the parent body of a subsidiary.
    Non-statutory body
    means a body that is subject to the Framework but is not established in legislation.
    Parent entity
    these are bodies to which a subsidiary or sub-committee is responsible.
    Public inquiry
    a time-limited body established to inquire into and report on specific matters whose members are appointed by the Governor-General, pursuant to the Inquiries Act 2013.
    Public sector employee
    covers employees in all the agencies in the wider public sector as well as other agencies associated with a Ministerial portfolio and any local authority as defined under section 5(1) of the Local Government Act 2002.
    Public servant
    applies to all employees of public service departments, departmental agencies, interdepartmental executive boards, and interdepartmental ventures. Public servants are a sub-group of public sector employees.
    Remuneration
    means the fees that members of bodies under coverage of the framework receive for their contribution to the body.
    Responsible Minister
    the Minister of the Crown with portfolio responsibility for the body – see the Cabinet Office Directory of Ministerial portfolios.
    Royal Commission
    a time-limited body established to inquire into and report on specific matters whose members are appointed by the Governor-General, pursuant to the Letters Patent and the Inquiries Act 2013.
    Statutory body
    means a body that is subject to the Framework and is established in legislation.
    Statutory entity
    one of the 5 categories of Crown entities under the Crown Entities Act 2004, it refers to Crown agents, autonomous Crown entities and independent Crown entities. Crown agents and autonomous Crown entities are covered by the Framework, but independent Crown entities are not (apart from reimbursement for expenses).
    Statutory tribunal and authority
    a diverse group of bodies independent of the executive whose predominant purpose is to exercise a defined specialist jurisdiction under legislative authority.
    Sub-committee
    in the Framework the term “sub-committee” is used to refer to any committee or sub-committee established by a parent body that is subject to the Framework.
    Tertiary Education Institution
    one of the 5 categories of Crown entities under the Crown Entities Act 2004. It includes colleges of education, polytechnics, specialist colleges, universities and wānanga which are bodies corporate established under Part 14 of the Education Act 1989 or section 268 of the Education and Training Act 2020.  They are covered by the Framework.
    Last updated: 
    Friday, 14 October 2022

    Help us improve DPMC

    Your feedback is very important in helping us improve the DPMC website.